From UticaRose@aol.com  Fri Apr 18 04:30:05 1997
From: UticaRose@aol.com (UticaRose@aol.com)
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 1997 23:30:05 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: M-TH: RMC criticism of GGMS
Message-ID: <970417232913_-1268324369@emout10.mail.aol.com>

In a message dated 97-04-17 11:11:06 EDT, cburford@gn.apc.org (Chris Burford)
writes:

<< To everyone so disconcerted about this type of discourse, I suggest 
 you check out what's going on theoretically in the dominant academy these 
 days.  However complex (and verbose) this type of theory may be (queer 
 theory, poststructuralism, post-colonialism, dominant cultural studies, 
 etc), it poses the greatest threat to Marxist theory (in the academy) 
 through its occlusion of a historically and materially based understanding 
 of the social totality.  
  >>
at best, isnt this like the hegelians. lots of sparks, fits and starts, but,
after years, just dead ends and a way for many to mark time, a hard thing to
do.


     --- from list marxism-thaxis@lists.village.virginia.edu ---