From jad@hopper.ACS.Virginia.EDU Tue Sep 28 12:42:50 EDT 1993
Article: 31780 of alt.conspiracy
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,alt.conspiracy.jfk,alt.activism,alt.society.civil-liberty,alt.individualism,talk.politics.misc,misc.headlines,soc.culture.usa
Path: murdoch!hopper!jad
From: jad@hopper.ACS.Virginia.EDU (John DiNardo)
Subject: Part 7, PACIFICA RADIO Investigates the Murder of President Kennedy
Message-ID: <CE13Ap.Fou@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
Followup-To: alt.conspiracy,alt.conspiracy.jfk 
Keywords: PACIFICA RADIO Investigates the Murder of President Kennedy
Sender: usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU
Organization: U.Va. Internet Public Access Project
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1993 19:54:25 GMT
Lines: 167


                     ____                    ____                   
     ____    ____----    ----____    ____----    ----____    ____    
         ----                    ----                    ----         
           T H E   P E O P L E'S   S P E L L B R E A K E R         
         ____                    ____                    ____       
     ----    ----____    ____----    ----____    ____----    ----    
                     ----                    ----                    

   DATE OF PRINTING                                 PRICE: __ CENTS
                    THE NEWSPAPER FOR THE PEOPLE OF
  [your territory; example:] EASTERN OHIO 


     *    *    *    *    *  MORNING EDITION  *    *    *    *    *

     
       EDITOR: John DiNardo                PUBLISHER: [your name (optional)] 
                                                                 

               ________________________________________
  
                From the free airwaves of The People's         
                Pacifica Radio Network station:
                     WBAI-FM (99.5)
                     505 Eighth Ave., 19th Fl.
                     New York, NY 10018
                       (212) 279-0707
               ________________________________________

Part 7, PACIFICA RADIO Investigates the Murder of President Kennedy
       ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

HARRISON LIVINGSTONE:
I haven't accused Nixon of that. You see, you're drawing inferences
that I've never said.                                             

In my books, "HIGH TREASON" and "HIGH TREASON II", in each one of
them, I have chapters on the Watergate connections, and I'm very
careful about what I say.

GARY NULL:
Frank Sturgis is a person who was involved with Watergate. Correct?

HARRISON LIVINSTONE:
Yeah. He, of course, helped the CIA put Fidel Castro in power. He
worked for Fidel Castro for a period of time.

GARY NULL:
Sturgis was around at the Bay of Pigs [Invasion]. Correct?

HARRISON LIVINGSTONE:
Absolutely. 

GARY NULL:
Frank Sturgis worked for the CIA. Correct?

HARRISON LIVINGSTONE:
He was a CIA agent.

GARY NULL:
And he was also at [the] Watergate [Break-in]. Correct?

HARRISON LIVINGSTONE:
Absolutely. He was involved with that whole mess.

GARY NULL:
Now, is that part of the inference that here were a group of people,
who have been involved with the Cuban-American anti-Castro element,
who now suddenly show up in the Watergate Break-in of the Democratic
Party's National headquarters -- Larry O'Brien's office?  Is that
what the inference is: that there had to have been something that
they felt would have been damaging to President Nixon, had O'Brien
had it and could have used it in a political campaign or in some
other way that would have caused Nixon and his supporters to lose
the election or to have embarrassed them in some way? Is that the
inference?

HARRISON LIVINGSTONE:
Yeah. I'll stick my neck out on that and I'll give the following
explanations. 

First of all, you have to ask yourself: doesn't it seem pretty
preposterous that a president would condone or know of or be
involved with a bunch of burglars who are raiding the offices of the
opposing party?  Think what would happen if they got caught?  Of
course, they might have had the hubris to believe, or the arrogance
to believe that: "If they got caught, so what; we can get them out
of it."  I don't think so. I think that this President got set up.
Nixon was another victim.  Of course, it couldn't happen to a nicer
guy. But he became like a ping-pong ball being bounced back and
forth between opposing forces, all trying to gain control.

You have one group that was trying to entrap the other group in the
burglary, and another group that set the burglary in motion -- and
still another group that had a rationale for trying to get
information, to find out what Larry O'Brien knew about the murder of
John Kennedy. According to Jim Hougan[sp] and others, the
[assassination] thing is far deeper and more intricate than anybody
ever imagined.

My personal information -- and this comes, really, from the
grapevine in the Washington area -- is that, of course, Larry
O'Brien and others had very clear information about what happened to
John Kennedy. So does the Kennedy Family! But they cannot publicly
say it. And some of the people in this lower cell who worked for
President Nixon .... You have to go back to the 1950s, when he was
vice-president under President Eisenhower, and this same group of
people under [conservative editor William F. Buckley's alleged CIA
trainer] E. Howard Hunt ran an operation on [shipping magnate
Aristotle] Onassis because of Onassis's deal with Saudi Arabia to
ship oil in Onassis's ships. This upset American policy at the time.
So they ran an operation to denigrate Onassis -- trying to convict
him of Internal Revenue [tax] violations and everything else. He was
sued and prosecuted.  Of course, he got out of all of it.  And,
ultimately, I think that's why Jacqueline Kennedy went to Onassis
and married him: because it was a safe house. He was the ONE person
who defeated the same group who murdered her husband.  Give that
some thought.

GARY NULL:
Okay.  One last question for you. What evidence do you have that
bullets were removed from the President's body at Bethesda Naval
Hospital BEFORE the autopsy began?

HARRISON LIVINGSTONE:
Alright.  In HIGH TREASON II, I make a proposal. And I am not 
stating as fact, as David Lifton and other people have stated, that
there has been a misrepresentation of a lot of the evidence in this
case. I am proposing that, during this period when there was more
than one team -- apparently, according to the testimony that we know
about -- taking sets of X-rays .... Obviously, the room was cleared
during [the taking of] this set of X-rays. And, according to an FBI
man who is in the legislature in Connecticut now -- he told me that
they were developing the X-rays right there in the X-ray room.
I must say that that runs counter to the evidence in the case, that
the X-rays were taken upstairs to be developed. But if, in fact,
they were set up to develop at least one set of X-rays, and if there
was a bullet in the neck, as we suspect, then a very quick operation
would have been performed there; unless ... you know, Dr. Perry was
digging around in the throat [at Parkland Hospital] in Dallas for
quite some time. He had to have an exploratory operation before the
tracheotomy tube was stuck in the neck. And it's conceivable that
somebody removed a bullet at Parkland Hospital before the President
was actually dead, and that it was palmed or pocketed; or [that this
was done] directly afterwards. In some of the testimony, Dr. Baxter
says that as soon as the President died, everybody was asked, by the
Secret Service, to leave the room. And he meant "everybody".     
It's possible that an operation was performed then.
                        (to be continued)
*    *    *    *    *    *    *    *    *    *    *    *    *    *    *  
        
      For those readers who are concerned about the highly treasonous
      crimes routinely perpetrated by our U.S. Government officials 
      who are supposed to be public servants of the highest rectitude,
      please contact a public interest law group that has valiantly
      filed lawsuits charging the CIA with crimes of treason, narcotics  
      trafficking, terrorism and murder.  Please write or phone:

        William Davis
        The Christic Institute
        8773 Venice Blvd.
        Los Angeles, CA 90034
           (310)287-1556

                                John DiNardo

