MIM Notes 277 · March 1, 2003 · Page 1
MIM Notes
March 1, 2003, Nº 277
The Official Newsletter of the Maoist Internationalist Movement (MIM)
Free
INSIDE: FBI v. Filipinos * More anti-war coverage * Una Página en Español...
MIM
PO Box 29670
Los Angeles, CA 90029
Return Service Requested
PRESORTED STANDARD
U.S. POSTAGE PAID
PERMIT #589
WORCESTER, MA
On the web: www.etext.info/Politics/MIM
You are not on a mailing list. You will not receive this paper again unless you take action.
Uncounted
thousands
march in New
York City
Message gets out
despite police
obstructions
NEW YORK CITY
February 15
A
lthough MIM Notes attended the
demonstration against the war
with Iraq in New York City, we
have no idea how many people attended.
All that we know for certain is that it
spanned more city blocks than any rally
ever attended--thanks to police tactics
addressed in another story on this page.
Undoubtedly, the demonstration was one
of the largest in New York history. A
reasonable estimate would probably
require a satellite photo.
We handed out 2500 copies of the
February 15 MIM Notes. The crowd
reaction was quite favorable, many saying
"oh, good." One young womyn stopped
to look at the graphic of Bush speaking
and laughed.
One anti-communist passed by and said,
"Maoist? Oh great, Mao would have shot
us all." In actual fact, Mao (the leader of
China from 1949 to 1976) sponsored many
demonstrations of millions against U.S.
wars. While Huey Newton attended those
demonstrations in China, he said he felt
safe in front of police unlike the situation
in the united $tates.
Our critic tried to raise a counterfactual
situation. China under Mao never
occupied part of Iraqi airspace and
threatened it with war as part of getting
leverage over Iraq's oil resources and
Saudi Arabia. Thus there are two ways
to avoid having to repress anti-war
movements: one is to avoid the predatory
Anti-war
protestors jam
Hollywood
boulevard
A
lively MIM, RAIL and SLALA
contingent hit the anti-war march
down Hollywood boulevard in
Los Angeles February 15. Our literature
table often attracted crowds several
people deep, looking to pick up their copies
of MIM Notes and sign our petitions. Our
comrades' efforts garnered 200+
signatures supporting our demand that the
University of California divest from Israel,
and another 100+ signatures in support
of Philippine political refugee Jose Maria
Sison.(1) We also handed out 1200 copies
of MIM Notes, and the crowd could
easily have absorbed more.(2)
In a stellar example of the importance
of quality activism over quantity, one
interested onlooker pushed us over the
200 mark on UC Divest signatures for
the day by taking charge and gathering
signatures himself. After listening to
RAIL debate Israeli settlerism with some
Zionist critics, this persyn grabbed a
clipboard and circulated through the
crowd filling it with signatures. Activists
from the Women in Black, an organization
of Israeli and Jewish wimmin who oppose
the occupation of the West Bank and
Gaza, also asked for blank petitions they
could circulate and return to us. Two
Croatian peace activists with banners
reading "No Support for U.$. War, No
support for I$rael" spent time at our table
discussing Israeli atrocities in the occupied
territories.
Plenty of protesters MIM talked to said
the February march was their first, and
MIM is happy to see the anti-war forces
continuing to build momentum. The main
march and rally in LA drew probably
50,000 or 60,000, and area demonstrations
from San Diego to Ventura drew an
additional 10,000. LAPD estimates for the
January 11 and February 15 marches
were 5,000 and 30,000; organizer
estimates were 15,000 and 100,000 for
the two events respectively.(3)
The number of new demonstrators who
came out in February means that there is
no shortage of work for revolutionaries
to do in getting our analysis of events out
to more people. The fact that two-thirds
of Amerikans support a war against Iraq
MANHATTAN
February 15
The major bourgeois media incorrectly
reported police tactics at the February
15th rally against war with Iraq in New
York City.
The police started by blocking off exits
between blocks ranging from the 40s to
the 60s so that people on the east side
highway called FDR Drive could not
approach the demonstration. Hence all
day long marchers streamed in from far
southern and northern reaches of
Manhattan toward the middle in the 40s
and 50s.
By closing the FDR exits and the north-
south avenues, the police had the effect
of angering travelers while spreading out
the demonstration into so many city
blocks as to make the demonstration
uncountable. In the experience of this
reporter, there has never been a
demonstration covering more city blocks.
The Associated Press incorrectly
reported: "City police provided no
MILLIONS MARCH AGAINST THE WAR
Media misreports police tactics
New York Police intentionally jam,
then spread out demonstrators
estimate of the
crowd, which
stretched 20
blocks deep and
two blocks
wide."(1) That
must have been
the view from
the royal
carriage. AP
should send some more people into the
streets to get a closer look. It's a lot easier
to quote some police bureaucrat sitting in
an office than to send several people into
more than one hundred city blocks for
several hours.
The New York Times correctly
reported: "crowds ... filled the avenue
from 49th Street to 72nd Street and spilled
over into side streets and to Second, Third
and Lexington Avenues, where thousands
more were halted at police barricades, far
from the sights and sounds of the
demonstration."(2) In fact, demonstrators
also streamed the whole length of 1st
Avenue south of the UN.
Originally activists planned the rally for
1st Avenue, but the City government
stigmatized the demonstrators by saying
they could not prevent such a large crowd
from attacking the UN building.(3) In
connection to this, the actual tactics of
the police were to create chokepoints by
closing 1st Avenue except for themselves.
Then they used "one-way valve" tactics
by allowing demonstrators to go to 2nd,
3rd and Lexington but not the other way
around.
One exception was at a checkpoint near
the UN on First Avenue. Police let in a
man draped in a Zionist flag. Later, horse-
mounted police singled out those waving
Palestinian flags for attack.
The New York Post reported attacks
Continued on page 7...
Continued on page 7...
Continued on page 8...
The L.A. march (MIM photo).
MIM Notes 277 · March 1, 2003 · Page 2
What is MIM?
The Maoist Internationalist Movement (MIM) is the collection of existing or emerging
Maoist internationalist parties in the English-speaking imperialist countries and their English-
speaking internal semi-colonies, as well as the existing or emerging Maoist Internationalist
parties in Belgium, France and Quebec and the existing or emerging Spanish-speaking
Maoist Internationalist parties of Aztlan, Puerto Rico and other territories of the U.$. Empire.
MIM Notes is the newspaper of MIM. Notas Rojas is the newspaper of the Spanish-speaking
parties or emerging parties of MIM. MIM upholds the revolutionary communist ideology
of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism and is an internationalist organization that works from the
vantage point of the Third World proletariat. MIM struggles to end the oppression of all
groups over other groups: classes, genders, nations. MIM knows this is only possibly by
building public opinion to seize power through armed struggle. Revolution is a reality for
North America as the military becomes over-extended in the government's attempts to
maintain world hegemony. MIM differs from other communist parties on three main
questions: (1) MIM holds that after the proletariat seizes power in socialist revolution, the
potential exists for capitalist restoration under the leadership of a new bourgeoisie within
the communist party itself. In the case of the USSR, the bourgeoisie seized power after the
death of Stalin in 1953; in China, it was after Mao's death and the overthrow of the "Gang
of Four" in 1976. (2) MIM upholds the Chinese Cultural Revolution as the farthest advance
of communism in humyn history. (3) As Marx, Engels and Lenin formulated and MIM has
reiterated through materialist analysis, imperialism extracts super-profits from the Third
World and in part uses this wealth to buy off whole populations of oppressor nation so-
called workers. These so-called workers bought off by imperialism form a new petty-
bourgeoisie called the labor aristocracy. These classes are not the principal vehicles to
advance Maoism within those countries because their standards of living depend on
imperialism. At this time, imperialist super-profits create this situation in the Canada, Quebec,
the United $tates, England, France, Belgium, Germany, Japan, Italy, Switzerland,
Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Israel, Sweden and Denmark. MIM accepts people as
members who agree on these basic principles and accept democratic centralism, the system
of majority rule, on other questions of party line.
"The theory of Marx, Engels, Lenin and Stalin is universally applicable. We should
regard it not as dogma, but as a guide to action. Studying it is not merely a matter of
learning terms and phrases, but of learning Marxism-Leninism as the science of revolution."
- Mao Zedong, Selected Works, Vol. II, p. 208.
Editor, MC206; Production, MC12
Letters
UNITED
FRONT
Get the new issue of MIM Theory, #14, and read the latest
theory on building the movement to overthrow
imperialism once and for all, in 174 pages. Articles include
MIM congress resolutions, history from the Spanish Civil
War to Puerto Rico, Kenya, and Stalin -- plus international
documents, reviews, and much more. Send $7.50 to the
address on page 2.
MIM Notes
The Official Newsletter of The Maoist Internationalist Movement
ISSN 1540-8817
MIM Notes is the bi-weekly newsletter of the Maoist Internationalist Movement. MIM
Notes is the official Party voice; more complete statements are published in our journal,
MIM Theory. Material in MIM Notes is the Party's position unless noted. MIM Notes
accepts submissions and critiques from anyone. The editors reserve the right to edit
submissions unless permission is specifically denied by the author; submissions are
published anonymously unless authors insist on identification (prisoners are never
identified by name). MIM is an underground party that does not publish the names of its
comrades in order to avoid the state surveillance and repression that have historically
been directed at communist parties and anti-imperialist movements. MCs, MIM comrades,
are members of the Party. The Revolutionary Anti-Imperialist League (RAIL) is an anti-
imperialist mass organization led by MIM (RCs are RAIL Comrades). MIM's ten-point
program is available to anyone who sends in a SASE.
The paper is free to all prisoners, as long as they write to us every 90 days to confirm
their subsciptions. There are no individual subscriptions for people outside prison.
People who want to receive newspapers should become sponsors and distributors.
Sponsors pay for papers, distributors get them onto the streets, and officers do both
distribution and financial support. Annual cost is: 12 copies (Priority Mail), $120; 25
(Priority Mail), $150; 50 (Priority Mail), $280; 100, $380; 200, $750; 900 (Express
Mail), $3,840; 900 (8-10 days), $2,200. To become a sponor or distributor, send
anonymous money orders payable to "MIM." Send to MIM, attn: Camb. branch, PO Box
400559, Cambridge, MA 02140. Or write mim3@mim.org.
Most back issues of MIM Notes are available free on our web site. The web site con-
tains thousands of documents, with ordering information for many more.
MIM grants explicit permission to copy all or part of this newspaper for any reason, as
long as we are credited.
For general correspondence, contact:
MIM
P.O. Box 29670
Los Angeles, CA 90029-0670
eMail: <mim@mim.org>
WWW: <http//www.etext.info/Politics/MIM>
Know your enemy
The principal contradiction in this
country is clearly between imperialism
and the oppressed internal nations, gangs,
cliques, folks, peoples, brothers, sisters,
cousins: brotherhoods as well as
sisterhoods formed in our hoods in North
America to make a change for the better
and stand against those in their way.
Many of us have realized it is the system
of the government, yet fail to face it and
take what is rightfully ours. Instead we
choose to step on others who have formed
for the same reasons we have, thus
becoming miniature forms of this beast
that continues to profit from our blood,
sweat and tears. North America is the
leading imperialist country in the world
who manipulates its currency to predict
and control all other capitalist countries.
So I challenge everyone representing
in unity for a change to truly guide their
hoods along the path that the Maoist
Internationalist Movement is presenting
as a form that will truly bring about
change for the better and an
understanding of the real cause of our
misery which brought us together in the
first place.
Mao Zedong clarified what transpires
every now and then when he stated,
"When imperialism launches a war of
aggression against a country, all its various
classes, except for some traitors, can
temporarily unite in a country's war
against imperialism. At such a time, the
contradiction between imperialism and the
country concerned becomes the principle
contradiction, while all other
contradictions among the various classes
of the country- are temporarily relegated
to a secondary or subordinate position."
Let us put the differences to the side
amongst us, like when imprisoned
representing, yet respecting each others'
space and realizing the prison
administration, like this country's system
is the true enemy.
Like demonstrated during many rallies
in society against acquittals of murderous
or abusive pigs, or the attempt to
implement more laws that further
oppress, exploit and enslave us all. If it
can bring unity for and on those occasions,
then this shall maintain that unity under
this movement.
I am definitely not calling upon any
section in the hood to cross flags, drop
flags or false flag, but to lift their flags
even higher for the cause of making a
change for the better with the guidance
that the Maoist Internationalist Movement
is providing through further educating to
better elevate and combat the beast that
imperialism and capitalism represents.
Therefore, understand that unless
you've studied within the system and
experienced the truth with each of your
senses. It is unlikely that you see this
country's plan to keep us divided and
distracted by waging war against one
another over things it can easily provide
to all of us if it was truly based on
freedom, justice and equality.
That sweet american pie, that's rotten
to its core. Let's wrap this up-
demonstrate your nation, gang, clique,
brotherhood or sisterhood by representing
not against each other but against what
created and maintains our differences;
this government of the united snakes
which must be held accountable for so
much bloodshed, hardship, and sorrow we
have been imposing blindly upon one
another.
Not no more, let's obtain knowledge
from the MIM and unite with its common
cause. Let's place our mark in this world
and truly be apart of history for the sake
of our loved ones of the future.
Contact the Maoist Internationalist
Movement and get involved in the cause
against what causes us so much
obstacles we face in our daily struggles.
--A New York Prisoner, January 2003
MIM Notes 277 · March 1, 2003 · Page 3
In late January the FBI sent an agent
to the home of a Filipino activist in the
Bay Area. Although the incident did not
result in arrest, this is just a small example
of the reactionary Patriot Act and other
"homeland security" measures that are
meant to bolster imperialism at home while
it attacks Third World peoples around the
world. At a press conference February 7
the Filipino activist issued a statement
which read in part:
"On the evening of Thursday, January
30, 2003 Special Agent William Root from
the FBI's Joint Terrorism Division came
to my house seeking information on
connections with Muslim extremists
groups in the Southern Philippines.
"As a community and peace activist, I
was aware that I did not have to provide
any information to the FBI agent. I knew
that my democratic rights were being
violated in my own home where I am
supposed to feel safe and secure. But
the element of surprise and the fact that
I have nothing to hide led to my full
cooperation in stepping outside and
answering questions as he requested.
"He asked me if I was born in
Mindanao and if I was Muslim. He asked
me if I had connections with extremist
groups in the Southern Philippines with
alleged links to the Al-Qaeda network. He
asked me if I was an American citizen
and if I was anti-American as he looked
over documents that the FBI had
researched on my background. He even
mentioned the fact that I have no criminal
record.
"I asked the agent what were the
reasons for this visit and he said that I
was among thousands of `tips' that the
FBI receives everyday since the 9/11
tragedy and I was chosen for further
investigation. Although he left without
incident, it was clear that the FBI wanted
to send a chilling message that "big
brother is watching" not just to me, but a
rapidly growing peace movement of
countless individuals, groups and alliances
who share a popular peoples sentiment
against the looming war in Iraq, the
Middle East, the Philippines and around
the world.
"The targeting of myself and other
peace activist are just the first in a
paranoid wave of racist federal programs
that are spending billions of taxpayer
dollars on so-called national security.
Intimidating peace activists in their
FBI harasses Filipino activist
A comrade claiming to be from the
Communist Party of India(M-L) has
written MIM repeatedly to assure us that
the pro-Lin Biao web page on the Internet
is genuine.(1) The problem involved nicely
demonstrates some security difficulties in
doing our work.
Recently two people approached MIM
under false pretenses asking for help
infiltrating an organization conducting
People's War. MIM brushes off most
such attempts with little difficulty.
Something we all have to understand is
that the enemy does not come out and
say "we are using a disguise"!
Most people in our camp do not think
through this and the logic of the struggle
it implies. We call it a matter of steering
between Liberalism (naivete) and
sectarianism. Fortunately, there is much
less trade-off than the bourgeoisie would
think. We can have both our security and
our non-sectarian approach.
To mention just two more recent
events, a member of the ruling class of a
Latin American country recently wrote
us to support Comrade Gonzalo in Peru.
He thought we were unaware of his other
activities, but he was wrong.
Of course, MIM has already written
about the Zionist hacker sending death
threats and provocations around the
Internet. In another example, MIM finds
itself the interest of police in Nepal. Yet
again, no one announces: we are police
from Nepal investigating what you are
doing!
There are two possible errors. One is
that we fail to work with people who are
genuine, because we suspect they are not
genuine. Two is that we work with
infiltrators and compromise security,
sometimes not even just in North America.
The bourgeois approach is to collect
dossiers on people and then decide
whether to "trust" them. Because we are
proletarian scientists, we ask instead "what
do we need to get done and can it be done
without `trust'"? If not, can we reorganize
the work so it can be done without "trust"
or individual hand-holding.
Those who are genuine must
understand: MIM does not answer pig
questions. It does not matter who you are.
If the question could be asked by a pig,
we don't answer it. In fact, if someone
answers it, it may not be a MIM member.
MIM also does not sponsor "revolutionary
tourism." People carrying MIM papers
or saying they are MIM members do not
have to be believed. MIM's line stands
or falls on its own merits independent of
the persyn claiming to uphold the MIM
line.
That does not mean we won't work
with people--even spies and infiltrators.
If you are actually proposing or assisting
us in work that can be done at arm's
length, then we should get along. If we
are not getting work off the ground with
you, it would be because we are too small
`Working together at arm's-length'
Indian subcontinent demonstrates security hurdles for communists
By a member of the
Revolutionary Anti-Imperialist
League (RAIL)
University of California at Los Angeles;
Wednesday February 5, 2003--Close to
1000 students, activists and professors
gathered at UCLA's Ackermann Grand
Ballroom for an anti war teach-in
sponsored by the student organization
"Speak Out!" The speakers were
Barbara Johns from Voices in the
Wilderness, Howard Zinn and Noam
Chomsky, the latter two present via
telephone.
As the teach-in got underway a few
pro-war protesters seized the stage with
signs that read: "Finish the Job!" and "No
war = No peace." They hardly resisted
the efforts of the organizers to remove
them and eventually slouched quietly on
the ground for the remainder of the-teach
in.
RAIL is pleased to report that Speak
Out! made overall correct claims about
imperialism, puppet governments and
Third World dictators like Saddam
Hussein. The emcee listed the top
imperialist State Department reasons for
war and divided them into half-truths and
outright lies. The half-truths were that
Saddam Hussein is a brutal dictator and
that Iraq has connections to Al-Qaida.
He correctly exposed the missing half of
the story that the United $tates has
historically supported the world's most
brutal dictators and was also the principal
supporter of Al-Qaida against the social-
imperialist Soviet Union's occupation of
Afghanistan. The outright lies were that
the United $tates harbors a profound
care for the people of Iraq--something
which doesn't square with daily U.$.
bombings of Iraq and barbaric U.$.-
supported sanctions which kill tens of
thousands of Iraqis each year. Another
outright lie is that the United $tates is
committed to the principle of stopping the
spread of weapons of mass destruction
(WMD). Even if the U.N. finds evidence
of WMD in Iraq, it was the United $tates
which sold these arms to Iraq in the first
place and hence bears principal
responsibility for making Iraq WMD-
capable.(6)
While Speak Out! did a good job
bringing some of the basic facts about
the impending war to UCLA students, it
still made some pragmatist, bourgeois-
democratic mistakes. For example, the
flyer they distributed carried the headline
"No war! That is what the majority says."
This contradicts polls which consistently
show that a majority of Amerikans support
a U.N.-endorsed war. A Speak Out!
member at first claimed that this showed
the strength of U.$. anti-war forces, but
later conceded that the U.N. would either
rubber stamp the war or be powerless to
stop it.
Generally Speak Out! chose its
arguments so they had broad appeal for
Amerikans--to the detriment of their
effectiveness. As we wrote in the last
issue of MIM Notes, what matters is that
we achieve the goals we have--peace.
If Amerikkkans are not ready to hear it, it
does not mean we can afford to dump
the goal!
Another example: Speak Out! argued
that an attack on Iraq is also an attack on
"us"--meaning Amerikans. The emcee
said that the principal reason for opposing
the U.$. war is that it is not in "our"
interests, which he cited as free health
care for Amerikans, low university tuition
and employment. This is another one of
those cases where Amerikans fantasize
about how bad things are in the U.$. and
how they can only get worse while failing
to grasp that imperialist war is the source
of the perks and comforts everyone,
including the poorest people in the United
$tates get to enjoy. This means things like
universities that don't get bombed by U.$.
manufactured weapons, hospitals (free or
otherwise) which are not bulldozed by
U.$. supported rogue states, high paying
jobs (most people on earth live on less
than $2.00 per day) and an employment-
ensuring militarized border to seal the
whole deal.
The first speaker was Barbara Johns
from Voices in the Wilderness, an
organization that struggles to end the
U.$.-imposed sanctions on Iraq by
documenting the effects that these
sanctions have on living conditions in Iraq.
She began by pledging her allegiance to
the unfortunate philosophy of moral
relativism which does not believe in truth
and consequently does not believe that
anything can be right or wrong. It's odd
that in spite of this ideology Barbara Johns
is out addressing a crowd of anti-war
activists and students. Opposing
Hundreds of students turn out to hear anti-war speakers
Continued on page 9...
Continued on page 8...
Continued on page 5...
MIM Notes 277 · March 1, 2003 · Page 4
Did you know?
There are more than
200 back issues of
MIM Notes available
on the MIM website?
Not only can you
browse more than 15
years of the
newspaper, you can
also keep up with the
very latest on MIM
agitation campaigns,
prisoner news, all the
latest on the U$ war,
and much more. MIM's
website is an
indispensable tool for
the revolutionary
movement. Get
involved!
www.etext.info/
Politics/MIM
by PIRAO Chief
February 1, 2003
January 2003 ended up having an
operational plan that would make it by
far the biggest month in MIM history in
all combined public opinion building.
Thanks to some breakdowns in the plan
regarding things being done for the first
time, January 2003 ended up being only a
record month, not a real breakthrough
type of month. On the plus side, the many
decent people demonstrating against the
war in Iraq boosted our circulation beyond
what was in the plan.
One thing I would point out about Table
1 is that it shows that almost 100 pages
went out to the public every single hour
of every day on average. Because I was
not happy with my report for last month,
I did some more research this month on
the question of slowing readership growth.
I'm still in the process of looking at some
leads into the question, to see if there is
something very basic that I am missing
from the picture. At the very least, I
thought this month I would break down
the results more to see if there were some
departments that were growing better
than 100% while others lagged. So for
the first time, we break down departments
into "movers & shakers," "pulling their
weight" and "laggards" (see Table 2).
In effect, some departments of the web
page are not growing anymore, because
there is not much development interest in
them. Other departments like Chinese
have done a stupendous job developing
but suffered a sudden loss of interest a
few months ago for reasons that are not
entirely clear but which must involve
someone with a great deal of social,
economic or political power somewhere.
This month I will take credit in two
areas where I have recently taken some
lumps. Our prison circulation is back on
track and in many ways doing better than
ever before. Though uneven, our print
circulation is also at record levels. We
are definitely back to the problem of not
having enough money instead of having
circulation bottlenecks and that's the way
it should be. I suspect some of January's
gains will not show up in statistics until
February.
January was a big month in terms of
proving to our web page developers their
effectiveness; even though overall growth
figures would not seem to prove it. While
Table 1. Summary statistics comparing January 2002 and January 2003
Statistic
January, 2002
January, 2003
% change
Number of different computers MIM served
15,388
23,536
+53%
Avg. MIM pages served per day
1,614
2,271*
+40.7%
MIM data transferred
2.285 Gb
7.148 Gb
+213%
MIM Notes printed copies compared with pre-911 (%)
+111%
MIM prison circulation averaged over two months compared with year earlier
-25%
Number of different MIM web page files actively chosen from
3,732
4,496
+20.5%
Amazon visitors sent from web page
163
273
+67.5%
NOTE: Starting with this report, we are not counting pages taken by search engines (robots), because they are taken more and more
often with more and more robots. This will result in an underestimation in the growth in pages taken per day.
Table 2. Web traffic broken down by department
Department
Jan. 2002 users
Jan. 2003 users
% change
Movers & shakers
Japanese
--
98
N/A
Korean
--
95
N/A
Vietnamese
--
98
N/A
About MIM
1,402
2,997
+114%
Bookstore
794
2,031
+158%
FAQ
817
1,763
+116%
Movies
308
1,718
+458%
RAIL
464
933
+101%
Notas Rojas (Spanish)
354
918
+159%
Agitation (campaigns)
388
904
+133%
Departments pulling their weight
MIM Theory
893
1,540
+72%
California
487
806
+66%
Contemporary Controversies page353
621
+76%
German
128
224
+75%
Finnish
130
212
+63%
Study packs
58
114
+97%
Laggards
MIM Notes
3,738
3,755
0%
Art
2,078
2,954
+42%
Black Panther Page
2,273
2,659
+17%
Massachusetts
1,125
1,485
+32%
Under Lock & Key
834
1,204
+44%
French
605
726
+20%
Washington, DC
477
722
+51%
Chinese
839
651
-22%
Classic quotes department
353
563
+59%
Maoist Sojourner
203
293
+44%
Russian
136
212
+56%
PIRAO
103
153
+49%
Polish
73
69
-5%
Table 3. Top five movie reviews
Movie review
Requests
Spiderman
333
Lord of the Rings: II
250
Matrix
141
Black Hawk
118
Bugs Life
100
I was uploading a movie review--before
it had been done and advertised in
"What's New," someone read it,
reviewed it on his web page and criticized
it for spelling errors present in one version
but not the final version up on the web
page. That's how closely people are
watching the movie reviews page (see
Table 3).
I was also in the position to put up a
document that didn't seem particularly
special that quickly received over 800 hits.
Seeing things like that happen make it
difficult to turn away from web
development work. The fact that the
impact of developers can be seen should
remind us that our growth figures are
relative to ourselves--relative to our own
past development efforts. It's not that we
are having no impact, but to grow we have
to surpass what we ourselves did before.
Web traffic broken down by department
The above table counts the languages
all the same way, based on number of
visitors. It reveals that Spanish is now
language number two, French third and
Chinese fourth for our web page.
Central task report:
January, 2003
Militarism is war-mongering or the
advocacy of war or actual carrying out
of war or its preparations.
While true pacifists condemn all
violence as equally repugnant, we
Maoists do not consider self-defense
or the violence of oppressed nations
against imperialism to be militarism.
Militarism is mostly caused by
imperialism at this time. Imperialism
is the highest stage of capitalism--
seen in countries like the United
$tates, England and France.
Under capitalism, capitalists often
profit from war or its preparations.
Yet, it is the proletariat that does the
dying in the wars. The proletariat
wants a system in which people do not
have self-interest on the side of war-
profiteering or war for imperialism.
Militarism is one of the most
important reasons to overthrow
capitalism. It even infects oppressed
nations and causes them to fight each
other.
It is important not to let capitalists
risk our lives in their ideas about war
and peace or the environment. They
have already had two world wars
admitted by themselves in the last 100
years and they are conducting a third
right now against the Third World.
Even a one percent annual chance of
nuclear war destruction caused by
capitalist aggressiveness or "greed" as
the people call it should not be tolerated
by the proletariat. After playing
Russian Roulette (in which the bullet
chamber is different each time and not
related at all to the one that came up in
previous spins) with 100 chambers and
one bullet, the chance of survival is
only 60.5% after 50 turns. In other
words, a seemingly small one percent
annual chance of world war means
eventual doom. After 100 years or turns
of Russian Roulette, the chances of
survival are only 36.6%. After 200
years, survival has only a 13.4%
chance.
What is militarism?
MIM Notes 277 · March 1, 2003 · Page 5
imperialist war isn't a popularity contest.
In the struggle for a long and lasting peace
worldwide one should expect to make
both enemies and allies along lines that
divide. In a clear example of what wishy-
washy ideology gets you, her self-
contradictory position led her to encourage
the crowd to "welcome" the pro-war
activists as "humyn beings" and not as
people who support the use of weapons
of mass destruction to achieve the death
of Iraqis. The crowd cheered.
The politically watered down blanket
term "humynity" was a big deal to the
first speaker. She went on about the
"dehumynization" of society by the
imperialist mass media which creates
war-mongers like Madeline Albright and
Colin Powell. Because humynity comes
in classes of oppressors and the
oppressed we don't speak of it in the
abstract. Albright and Powell represent
a class in whose interest it is to carry out
war. The mass media represents that
same class and is therefore uncritical of
it.
After winning encouragement for the
pro-war activists and their "humynity"
Johns talked about her recent trip to Iraq
where she came to realize that the U.$.
war against Iraq has continued for 12
years with daily bombings and sanctions.
As a consequence of this ongoing war
there are few hospitals or universities in
Iraq. She says that for the first time in
her life she witnessed many children
dying, of cancer in particular.
Chemotherapy is non-existent in Iraq as
U.$.-supported sanctions prohibit the
manufacture or import of anything
associated with this potentially life-saving
treatment. The major preventable
diseases in Iraq responsible for the death
of thousands are radiation poisoning
(from living in a land littered with U.$.
bombs), cholera and typhoid. There are
not enough hospitals to admit the countless
victims of the ongoing U.$. war.
Johns claimed that Iraqis lack "the
ability to organize politically" and said,
"we are lucky to live in the United States
and should be grateful." But as MIM has
said: this is a fantasy. There is no statistic
in any country that compares to U.$.
imprisonment of Black people (1) and
MIM has to constantly fight against the
U.$. "freedom of censorship" (2) to
distribute MIM Notes and organize
prisoners.(3) Of all the speakers Johns
was the least scientific.
The next speaker was Howard Zinn
whose short talk could be favorably
summarized as "Don't believe U.$. lies
about war. The real reason for a war
against Iraq is oil." Zinn correctly pointed
out that the United $tates is the country
with the most weapons of mass
destruction and noted that the United
$tates is determined to concoct
"evidence" for why war is needed.
He did not develop the line about a U.$.
war for oil but said instead that he believes
that the principal danger to world peace
does not lie with Saddam Hussein but
Hundreds of students turn out to hear anti-war speakers
with George Bush. According to Zinn
war is useful for the Bush administration
to deflect attention from what he calls an
"attack against national wealth" and a
"crime against the Amerikan people."
Teaming up with Speak Out! Zinn thinks
that environmental degradation in the
United $tates, health care, education,
housing and hospitals are the real issues
being ignored by the Bush administration.
This tag-team of speakers suffers from
thinking that the main problem with war
is ignoring Amerikan concerns but only
internationalism can bring the fact that
the problem is U.$. expansion and
imperialism.
The problem of getting hung-up on