MIM Notes 286 · September 1, 2003 · Page 1
MIM Notes
September 1, 2003, Nº 286 The Official Newsletter of the Maoist Internationalist Movement (MIM)
Free
INSIDE: Oakland schools * Texas prisons * Censors * Una Página en Español...
MIM
PO Box 29670
Los Angeles, CA 90029
Return Service Requested
PRESORTED STANDARD
U.S. POSTAGE PAID
PERMIT #56365
BOSTON, MA
On the web: www.etext.info/Politics/MIM
You are not on a mailing list. You will not receive this paper again unless you take action.
Spain sends
Adolfo
Olaechea
to Peru
VIOLATES LAW,
TREATY WITH
PERU
by mim3@mim.org
August 7, 2003
B
ourgeois newswire service
Reuters reported that Spain
extradited Adolfo Olaechea to
Peru and that he landed in Peru by plane
on August 7 with a bullet-proof vest. Peru
sought Olaechea for openly political
reasons concerning Olaechea's speaking
in England for the Maoist road in Peru
blazed by the Communist Party of Peru
(PCP).
Luis Arce Borja in Belgium responded
that the extradition of English permanent
resident Adolfo Olaechea was an
international kidnapping done with the
coordination of a certain Spanish judge
and Peru's embassy. Peru openly admits
that the charge it used to extradite Adolfo
Olaechea was "defending terrorism." As
Adolfo Olaechea's attorney pointed out
on July 24th, article 5.1 of the extradition
treaty between Spain and Peru says
terrorists may be extradited but not people
with differing political views. So much for
Spain belonging to the "free world."
September 11 report
Reactionaries' failed `security'
policies exposed
John Ashcroft and other Bush henchmen
have detained thousands without charge --
without preventing `terror' attacks.
A
t the press conference
announcing the release of the
Congressional report on
September 11, the chairman of the House
intelligence committee admitted he did not
know who would be behind the next attack
on the United $tates or when, where, or
how it would happen. Whether the
Representative understood it or not, this
was an admission that the U.$.
government's police-style approach to
ending violence is a failure. Amerikans
should stop supporting a government
which imprisoned thousands of
immigrants without charge and which
spends billions attacking countries around
the globe in the name of security, yet
admits that it cannot stop the next attack.
Days before the September 11 report
was released, an internal Justice
Department report leaked to the New
York Times found evidence that law
enforcement officials were guilty of
"serious civil rights and civil liberties
violations" while enforcing the Patriot
Act. Over the last six months, the Justice
Department received an average of
almost six Patriot-Act related complaints
per day, with allegations ranging from
verbal abuse to beating.(1)
However, the Justice Department
report apparently did not comment on the
basic injustice of the sweeping arrests of
largely Muslim immigrants under the
auspices of the Patriot Act, which allows
non-citizens to be held for up to a week
without charge. Nor did it comment on
the absurdity of these arrests: only one
of the thousands arrested has been
charged with any crime related to
September 11. To paraphrase Benjamin
Franklin, an Amerikan "founding father"
supposedly revered by the Amerikan
government, those who give up essential
liberties for temporary security will have
Continued on page 5...
Continued on page 8...
Notes
Rouges
hits the
streets
The first issue of the French
publication "Notes Rouges" came out
at the end of July. At the Gay Pride
parade of August 3rd, 150 free copies
went out to the revelers, many sporting
stickers and buttons supporting the
struggle against AIDS. MIM supports
the right to gay marriage, even within
the existing oppressive patriarchal
system. MIM has always struggled at
the forefront to end discrimination
against gays/lesbians.
The significance of the "Notes
Rouges" is that it is the first print
publication in French to uphold Mao and
oppose imperialist country parasitism
in its true extent.
Big change needed to
avoid situations like this
The media
Something the public needs to
understand is that the capitalist media is
making big money off the Kobe case. The
media should not be trusted on questions
of fact especially in this case, because
its first priority is to entertain the public
to boost ratings or sales and increase
advertising revenue. In contrast, we at
MIM put out a newspaper called "MIM
Notes," which far from being for profit
Communist opinion on
the Kobe Bryant case
gives us the
dubious honor of
d r a i n i n g
comrades' bank
accounts. We
drain our bank
accounts out of a
sense of duty and
we believe the
public should
often take advantage of such non-
commercial sources of political and social
analysis.
MIM would like to emphasize that it
has no first-hand involvement in the Kobe
Bryant case just like 99.9% of the media.
We have no secret stash of info on the
accuser, but we are willing to talk about
Continued on page 6...
MIM Notes 286 · September 1, 2003 · Page 2
What is MIM?
The Maoist Internationalist Movement (MIM) is the collection of existing or emerging
Maoist internationalist parties in the English-speaking imperialist countries and their English-
speaking internal semi-colonies, as well as the existing or emerging Maoist Internationalist
parties in Belgium, France and Quebec and the existing or emerging Spanish-speaking
Maoist Internationalist parties of Aztlan, Puerto Rico and other territories of the U.$. Empire.
MIM Notes is the newspaper of MIM. Notas Rojas is the newspaper of the Spanish-speaking
parties or emerging parties of MIM. MIM upholds the revolutionary communist ideology
of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism and is an internationalist organization that works from the
vantage point of the Third World proletariat. MIM struggles to end the oppression of all
groups over other groups: classes, genders, nations. MIM knows this is only possibly by
building public opinion to seize power through armed struggle. Revolution is a reality for
North America as the military becomes over-extended in the government's attempts to
maintain world hegemony. MIM differs from other communist parties on three main
questions: (1) MIM holds that after the proletariat seizes power in socialist revolution, the
potential exists for capitalist restoration under the leadership of a new bourgeoisie within
the communist party itself. In the case of the USSR, the bourgeoisie seized power after the
death of Stalin in 1953; in China, it was after Mao's death and the overthrow of the "Gang
of Four" in 1976. (2) MIM upholds the Chinese Cultural Revolution as the farthest advance
of communism in humyn history. (3) As Marx, Engels and Lenin formulated and MIM has
reiterated through materialist analysis, imperialism extracts super-profits from the Third
World and in part uses this wealth to buy off whole populations of oppressor nation so-
called workers. These so-called workers bought off by imperialism form a new petty-
bourgeoisie called the labor aristocracy. These classes are not the principal vehicles to
advance Maoism within those countries because their standards of living depend on
imperialism. At this time, imperialist super-profits create this situation in the Canada, Quebec,
the United $tates, England, France, Belgium, Germany, Japan, Italy, Switzerland,
Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Israel, Sweden and Denmark. MIM accepts people as
members who agree on these basic principles and accept democratic centralism, the system
of majority rule, on other questions of party line.
"The theory of Marx, Engels, Lenin and Stalin is universally applicable. We should
regard it not as dogma, but as a guide to action. Studying it is not merely a matter of
learning terms and phrases, but of learning Marxism-Leninism as the science of revolution."
- Mao Zedong, Selected Works, Vol. II, p. 208.
Editor, MC206; Production, MC12
Letters
MIM Notes
The Official Newsletter of The Maoist Internationalist Movement
ISSN 1540-8817
MIM Notes is the bi-weekly newsletter of the Maoist Internationalist Movement. MIM
Notes is the official Party voice; more complete statements are published in our journal,
MIM Theory. Material in MIM Notes is the Party's position unless noted. MIM Notes
accepts submissions and critiques from anyone. The editors reserve the right to edit
submissions unless permission is specifically denied by the author; submissions are
published anonymously unless authors insist on identification (prisoners are never
identified by name). MIM is an underground party that does not publish the names of its
comrades in order to avoid the state surveillance and repression that have historically
been directed at communist parties and anti-imperialist movements. MCs, MIM comrades,
are members of the Party. The Revolutionary Anti-Imperialist League (RAIL) is an anti-
imperialist mass organization led by MIM (RCs are RAIL Comrades). MIM's ten-point
program is available to anyone who sends in a SASE.
The paper is free to all prisoners, as long as they write to us every 90 days to confirm
their subsciptions. There are no individual subscriptions for people outside prison.
People who want to receive newspapers should become sponsors and distributors.
Sponsors pay for papers, distributors get them onto the streets, and officers do both
distribution and financial support. Annual cost is: 12 copies (Priority Mail), $120; 25
(Priority Mail), $150; 50 (Priority Mail), $280; 100, $380; 200, $750; 900 (Express
Mail), $3,840; 900 (8-10 days), $2,200. To become a sponor or distributor, send
anonymous money orders payable to "MIM." Send to MIM, attn: Camb. branch, PO Box
400559, Cambridge, MA 02140. Or write mim3@mim.org.
Most back issues of MIM Notes are available free on our web site. The web site con-
tains thousands of documents, with ordering information for many more.
MIM grants explicit permission to copy all or part of this newspaper for any reason, as
long as we are credited.
For general correspondence, contact:
MIM
P.O. Box 29670
Los Angeles, CA 90029-0670
eMail: <mim@mim.org>
WWW: <http//www.etext.info/Politics/MIM>
Trotskyist website
reader perturbed
Dear MIM,
I hope that you people eventualy realise
the absolute babarity of Mao and Stalin
and get on board with the rest of us
communists. You are discrediting
everything that Marx - Engels - Lenin -
Trotsky - Luxembourg - and the every
other true communist out there has done.
Stalin and Mao were and are not the way
forward.
Mao and Stalin coming to power meant
the death of international socialism for an
indefinable amount of time.
The only thing that pleases me on your
web site is your admission at being a small
party - may it stay that way.
--Trotskyist, July, 2003
mim3@mim.org replies for MIM:
Barbarism is dying from hunger and lack
of medical care. Barbarism is not shooting
a small portion of society spreading
confusion and otherwise throwing up
obstacles to progress as the writer above
does by referring to a movement that has
produced no social change in the last 75
years. Whether he is objective enough to
know it, the above critic of us is a part of
the status quo.
Barbarism is also not having universal
education. Stalin and Mao fixed those
problems--hunger, medical care and
education. That's why the life
expectancies of their countries doubled
despite all the repression of liberal-radical
idiots.
What this sort of criticism always boils
down to is two things: 1) A defense of
the status quo in the guise of Trotskyist
(or fill in the blank) principles which have
failed to bring about changes like Stalin
and Mao did. 2) Valuing the lives of
liberal-radical dissidents at 100 or 1000
times that of the toiling peasants and
workers. There is no other explanation
for how people supposedly interested in
the Soviet Union's history could ignore
the progress there in the name of their
impotent principles.
by mim108
Some people see a "silver lining" in the
cloud of budget crises facing state
correctional operations. In Texas, for
example -- which had to cut $172 million
from its corrections budget by June 2003
and another $525 over the next two years
-- the state has passed a law mandating
treatment probation and treatment for
some first-time drug offenders.(1) So, the
need to save money helped reformers
get some of what they wanted. We don't
know the details of this change yet, but it
could be a positive development. At the
same time, Texas Rep. Ray Allen claims
that the parole rate in Texas has risen
from 16 to 25 percent in the last year, as
the parole board faces pressure to reduce
the prison population.
On the other hand, the budget crisis also
lent support to those who want to
increase the privatization of Texas prisons
-- private prisons currently hold 7% of
Texas prisoners -- although in the end
the bill did not pass. And, in a supremely
humanistic move, they proposed a policy
of paroling prisoners who are in a coma
(there were two at the time) -- to save
money.(1)
A prisoner sent us a newsletter
published by a lawyer named James
Randall Smith, which summarizes the
past year in Texas like this: "A quick
evaluation ... indicates that if the bill would
have made the inmates or parolees life a
little easier, the bill did not pass, if it made
life more difficult ... it passed."
Smith reports that the worst law will
allow the parole board to set off prisoners
for 5 years. One prisoner tells us, "I can
smell prison riots all over that bill, and so
can they."
Smith also reports that budget problems
cost more than 145 jobs at the Windham
School District, which runs programs that
help people qualify for parole, and 600
jobs in the corrections department, many
of them in health care. Those who lose
their jobs have an opportunity to become
prison guards - - because the state can't
hire people to fill these. These bitter,
untrained ex-bureaucrats sound like
excellent additions to the prison guard
population.
We conclude that most of the effects
of the budget crisis will be bad for Texas
prisoners, although it might also prompt
some positive reforms. But MIM has
always resisted the argument that the
oppression of the prison system is bad
because it wastes government money.
The real issue is national oppression and
social control. The comings and goings
of budget travails don't change that
underlying dynamic.
Notes:
1. "Dollars and Sentences: Legislators
Views on Prisons, Punishment, and the
Budget Crisis," by Robin Campbell. Vera
Institute of Justice, New York, July 2003
(http://www.vera.org/publications/
publications_5.asp? publication_id=204).
Texas prisoners feel
brunt of budget crisis
MIM Notes 286 · September 1, 2003 · Page 3
The Japanese parliament voted in July
to send troops to Iraq, despite public
opposition to the Iraq war and the
Japanese Constitution's ban on the use
of force in settling international disputes.
The government of Prime Minister
Junichiro Koizumi claimed that Japanese
troops would only be sent to non-combat
zones; his critics correctly noted that
"there are no noncombat zones" in Iraq
(1).
The deployment of Japanese troops in
a combat zone outside Japan is the latest
rutsch down the slippery slope of
resurgent Japanese militarism--or
perhaps it would be better to say, it's the
latest crack in the crumbling façade of
official Japanese pacifism. The Japanese
military, called the Self Defense Forces,
is among the five largest in the world.
The Japanese navy sent ships to the
Indian Ocean to support Amerika's war
in Afghanistan. Japan bankrolled
Amerikan military adventures such as the
1991 Gulf War. And, of course, the
massive military bases that the Japanese
government grants the Amerikans played
important roles in the Korean and Vietnam
wars and continue to threaten much of
Asia (2).
Japanese reactionaries including some
in Prime Minister Koizumi's Liberal
Democratic Party have been pushing for
a more aggressive military in recent years.
In part, this campaign has been cultural.
Schoolbooks have been re-written to de-
emphasize Japanese war crimes; movies
have been made glorifying Japanese
militarists (3) or promoting the line that
the Japanese were the victims in World
War II (4); Koizumi has offended his
Chinese and Korean neighbors by visiting
shrines to Japanese war veterans--visits
analogous to Ronald Reagan's official
stop at a German cemetery honoring dead
SS men--and Koizumi wants to change
the name "Self Defense Forces" to
Japan approves sending troops to Iraq
Continued on next page...
Parents and activists have come
together in response to a series of events
within Oakland schools in the last school
year including abuse by teachers, the
threat of denying many students the right
to graduate and one incident where the
Secret Service was called in to berate
students.
A recent public forum featured Dr.
Randolph Ward, the newly appointed
administrator of Oakland Unified School
District, and Nneka Simon who is the
mother of a boy who was beaten by his
teacher in the Claremont school in
Oakland. The beating of Simon's son was
one of the many recent incidents that has
brought attention to the education system
in the community. Despite having 16
witnesses there has been no investigation
and the teacher was not brought to jail in
handcuffs as is common procedure with
students who use physical violence.
The International Peoples' Democratic
Uhuru Movement (InPDUM) sponsored
the forum, which also featured Chairman
Omali Yeshitela of the African People's
Socialist Party. While we have political
disagreements with Yeshitela and the
InPDUM,(1) we agreed with what they
had to say about education for oppressed
nation youth in oppressor nation schools.
In her presentation, Simon brought
together anecdotes and statistics to link
the education system to the systematic
oppression of Blacks in the United $tates.
She cited that Black students are expelled
twice as much as they were in 1974 and
they are 2.6 times as likely to be expelled
as white students, who usually have to
break the law to be expelled. This
treatment of oppressed youth as criminals
from such a young age only prepares
them for the more aggressive treatment
they will receive by the criminal injustice
system. This system in turn takes away
oppressed people's access to education
through the Higher Education Act which
prevents convicted felons from getting
financial aid. That's 13% of Black men
who cannot get financial aid or even vote
in most states. These questions of access
to knowledge and political power have
existed since Africans were first brought
to this continent as slaves. Therefore to
attempt to solve the problem of education
in the Black community without solving
national oppression by imperialism is
attacking a symptom without killing the
disease.
After touring some Oakland schools for
the first time, Dr. Ward's first criticism
of their condition was the prevalence of
graffiti, which he claims prevents "a
sense of pride." Besides being the
expression of students themselves in
making the school their own, graffiti is
hardly the greatest concern for their
successful education. Maybe a sense of
respect for the school would decrease
graffiti. But even if that is so, Ward's
approach is backwards. The solution is
to make the school serve the kids, not
eliminate graffiti to create "a sense of
pride." Other problems in the physical
conditions include leaking ceilings and the
usual lack of materials in oppressed nation
schools. Yeshitela's response to all this
is that you should be able to get a good
education sitting outside under a tree with
no books. The fundamental aspect of the
problem being the approach of the system
and not the materials available to the
school.
The greatest example of this is the
Eurocentric curriculum that comes from
the materials that are available. How can
students relate to school when the system
is telling them that they have no worth
and do not even merit mention? Yeshitela
stressed that Bill Cosby and peanut
farming do not represent the reality of
Blacks in the United $tates now or ever.
As long as that is the Black history that
appears in text books, more books is not
going to help the situation.
In an effort to exert real power in the
Oakland school system, InPDUM will be
holding weekly meetings for a committee
to address education in the community
that will be in direct contact with Ward
and will work with parents and teachers
who have seen their efforts crushed by
the school system. Continued vigilance
on these issues is urgent since education
is one of the biggest concerns facing the
Black community in Amerika. Along with
prisons and the police, it is of the most
blatant faces of oppression that the u$
government is showing the oppressed
within its borders. And without the bigger
picture, provided by Yeshitela and Simon
at this forum, reforms in the school system
are nothing more than a band aid for the
problems of oppressed people under
imperialism.
The Amerikan school system is
threatening the oppressed by alienating
children. Rather than giving them an
education that will help them survive, it
prepares them for life in oppressive
government institutions. As Yeshitela
Oakland school system channels
oppressed youth to California prisons
pointed out, this is not an issue of money,
this is the issue of why do oppressed
people exist in this system and how the
system treats those people. It is the
seizure of control that will change things,
and the shifting of funds is only secondary
to the question of power. Fighting to win
requires the complete elimination of all
forms of oppression to ensure quality
education and other survival rights for all
people.
Notes:
1. See our review of the African
People's Socialist Party in MIM Theory
8.
MIM Notes has seen a big spike in
circulation since the "war on
terrorism" began. It's not surprising:
MIM Notes is a free and independent
newspaper. Yes, there are especially
now knee-jerk patriots who believe
everything Bush says and pass by a
chance to read MIM Notes. There are
other patriots and internationalists
who realize that at this time papers
like MIM Notes can undo the huge
spectacle that Uncle Sam is creating
for its own benefit.
Sure, you have seen MIM Notes
around, but MIM Notes needs people
to do two simple things: 1) Pay for it
(postage and printing), 2) Distribute
it!
MIM is looking for sponsors,
distributors and officers. Sponsors pay
for papers; distributors get them onto
the streets and officers do both
distribution and financial support.
Distribute # Cost per year
12 (Priority Mail)
$120
25 (Priority Mail)
$150
50 (Priority Mail)
$280
100
$380
200
$750
900 (Express Mail!)
$3,840
900 (8-10 days)
$2,200
If you know you have some good
places to do distribution, we suggest
starting at 200 and working your way
up higher. If you are not willing to do
distribution, just send money. If you
are not willing to pay, then request
papers after somehow proving to the
party that you are serious (words
won't count). You who will cough up/
raise the money to distribute 900
papers each issue and then do the
distribution, you are what drives this
party forward.
A call for MIM Notes
sponsors and distributors!
Make anonymous money orders payable to "MIM." Send to MIM,
attn: Camb. branch, PO Box 400559, Cambridge, MA 02140. Contact
MIM in regards to this campaign by writing mim3@mim.org
MIM Notes 286 · September 1, 2003 · Page 4
Hotaru no haka, 1988
Isao Takahata,
director
Nobody will confuse this animated
Japanese film with a Disney cartoon.
Grave tells the sad story of two Japanese
children orphaned by an Amerikan
bombing raid during World War II. Left
to fend for themselves, they slowly starve
to death. However, like other films which
simply try to convey the horrors of war
-- the German films Das Boot and
Stalingrad come to mind -- Grave
makes no attempt to explain the causes
of wars and how they can be avoided in
the future.
Because of that, MIM can't
recommend the film, but we will say that
it is more progressive in the Amerikan
context than in the Japanese. Grave
reminds Amerikans that the firebombing
of Tokyo -- to say nothing of Hiroshima
and Nagasaki -- had brutal consequences
for the civilian population, on a scale far
surpassing anything Amerikans have
experienced. It's a far cry from the
jingoistic Pearl Harbor (2001), which
portrayed an Amerikan raid as a great
spectacle over empty warehouses,
watched from afar by two kimono-clad
women on a lazy afternoon.
In the Japanese context, Grave bolsters
the prejudice that Japan was the victim
in the war. The children's father is a naval
officer, and he is simply portrayed as doing
his duty and defending Japan. No mention
is made of Japan's imperial ambitions in
Asia and the Pacific; no discussion of the
rape of Nanking, the occupation of Korea,
etc. etc. When the older boy Seita learns
that Japan lost the war, he weeps, not
believing that the invincible Japanese
empire could lose. Just as in the United
$tates today, most children in Japan and
Germany brought up during World War
II were taught to identify with their
militaristic governments, so there is
nothing wrong with acknowledging this
fact -- but Grave does so without
comment. The scene where Seita breaks
down could provoke outrage that the
Japanese militarists twisted his mind, but
it could just as easily promote nostalgia
for the good old days when Japan had a
strong navy and army.
One reviewer (out of over 100) on an
internet message board argued that
Grave contained a subtle critique of great
nation pride. If so, it was too subtle, as
most of the other comments did not pick
up on this. Grave suffers from what
could be called the "Mother Courage"
effect.
Mother Courage and Her Children
is a play written by the German anti-
militarist Bertolt Brecht during World War
II. The title character tries everything she
can in the context of war and
capitalism to keep her children alive, but
by the end of the play, war has killed them
all. The play was intended as a critique
Grave of the Fireflies is no Disney cartoon
of Mother Courage and a reminder that
suffering the horrors of war was not
enough to teach people how to avoid it in
the future. When it premiered in the rubble
of Berlin after the war, however,
audiences hailed Mother Courage as a
heroic character, indicative of the
"Armed Forces."
The militarization campaign has also
been structural. "Although Japan's richly
financed military forces boast some of
the world's most sophisticated
hardware--weapons systems like the
[U.$.-supplied] Aegis destroyer and
[U.$.-supplied] F-15 fighter jets--their
actual configuration, as well as training
for their use, has been overwhelmingly
defensive.
"That is changing abruptly. The country
is acquiring in-air refueling capacity for
its fighter force, as well as developing a
sophisticated air support ship--part
destroyer, part helicopter carrier--that
news reports say is intended to allow
operations near the Korean Penninsula."
Furthermore, calls for Japan to build
nuclear weapons are apparently getting
louder--this in a country with strong anti-
nuclear sentiments (2).
There are economic reasons behind the
military expansion. Instead of cutting the
United $tates a check for services
rendered, Japan could invest in its own
formidable defense industry.
Although the United $tates helped draft
Japan's "pacifist" constitution, it has
sheltered and nourished Japanese
militarism when convenient. The
Amerikans helped Japanese war
Japan approves sending troops to Iraq
criminals escape prosecution; many
eventually served in the post-war
government. The CIA paid off Liberal
Democratic Party officials for their
service in keeping Amerikan bases in
Japan during the Cold War.(5) Amerikan
politicians pissed and moaned in 1991 and
again this spring that Japan was not
pulling its weight in the campaigns against
Iraq.
Disturbingly, Amerikan provocations in
Korea--starting with Clinton's non-
compliance with the 1994 "Agreed
Framework" agreement with north Korea
and extending to the Bush administration's
charges last Fall that north Korea was
making nuclear weapons--may be aimed
in part at Japan. This wouldn't be the first
time the United $tates manufactured a
threat or the appearance of a threat to
force countries to play ball--or even just
buy Amerikan weapons. The United
$tates did this in Iraq in the early nineties.
Koizumi's government uses the supposed
threat from north Korea to justify both its
close alignment with U.$. foreign policy
and its own expanding militarism.
Gregory Clark, a former Australian
diplomat, argues that sending troops to
Iraq may backfire on the militarists.
"[Koizumi and his hawkish advisers] like
to talk about the need for Japan to `shed
blood' in support of various pro-U.S.
causes. They want to galvanize the
Japanese public out of `heiwa boke'
(peace loving stupor), and to force Japan's
wimpish [Self Defense Forces] to
become a bloodied, full-fledged fighting
force.
"But can this happen if the blood is shed
for a shabby cause fought brutally and
unfairly in a distant country and with little
chance of success? This is what we saw
in Vietnam. It is likely what we will see
in Iraq."(6) MIM agrees with this
dialectic, although we frankly fear that
militaristic sentiments will initially increase
as the first score or hundred casualties
arrive home. It took close to a decade of
steady Amerikan military losses far above
those currently seen in Iraq to turn
Amerikan opinion against the war in
Vietnam. It took absolute military defeat
in World War II and terrible civilian
suffering in Dresden and Hiroshima to
bring down Germany and Japan and
create the possibility that those militaristic
and imperialistic societies might rejoin
humynity. That chance was squandered,
principally by Amerika, as it groomed
militaristic and imperialistic elements in
Germany and Japan for its own ends.
With the tools of war becoming more
and more destructive, we cannot squander
our next chance to destroy militarism and
imperialism once and for all. This means
taking the re-humanizing process for
formerly imperialist societies seriously and
preventing them from lapsing into their
old, exploitative ways. In other words, this
requires an international dictatorship of
the proletariat over the defeated
imperialist countries. In principle, this
would be similar to the much-ballyhooed
Amerikan occupation of Germany and
Japan after World War II--except that
instead of being run by an imperialist
power for its own ends the dictatorship
of the proletariat would be run by people
aiming to end war and exploitation,
globally.
Notes:
1. New York Times, 28 Jul 2003.
2. New York Times, 25 Jul 2003.
3. MIM Notes 168, 15 Aug 1998.
4. See our review of "Grave of the
Fireflies," in this issue.
5. Chalmers Johnson, ITAL Blowback
END, New York: Henry Holt, 2000, pp.
16-17.
6. The Japan Times, 13 Jul 2003.
Reprinted at: www.zmag.org/content/
print_article.cfm?itemlID=3908§ionID=17
persistence of ordinary Germans to carry
on with their lives as they always had
despite the trauma of defeat.
Although perhaps intended to challenge
oppressor-nation complacency, as
Mother Courage was, Grave never
goes beyond sentimental humanism.
MIM Notes 286 · September 1, 2003 · Page 5
Did you
know?
There are
more than 200
back issues of
MIM Notes
available on
the MIM
website? Not
only can you
browse more
than 15 years
of the
newspaper,
you can also
keep up with
the very latest
on MIM
agitation
campaigns,
prisoner
news, all the
latest on the
U$ war, and
much more.
MIM's website
is an
indispensable
tool for the
revolutionary
movement.
Get involved!
www.etext.info/
Politics/MIM
Much of the spin surrounding the
release of the Congressional inquiry into
September 11 focused on so-called
"intelligence failures." For example, the
CIA allegedly had information it did not
share with the FBI and vice versa. This
discussion is largely a re-hash of
complaints made by reactionaries
immediately following September 11:
intelligence agencies' hands are tied; they
can't talk to each other; they can't recruit
some bad guys to catch the other bad
guys; they can't try and kill the bad guys
themselves; etc.
Then and now, these complaints miss
the main point: in the "good old days" when
Amerikan spy agencies officially had--
or simply used--these powers, they could
not stop attacks on Amerikan troops and
civilians. Heavy CIA presence in Iran
provoked the embassy hostage situation;
it did not stop it. Amerikan involvement
in Palestine and Lebanon provoked the
attack on the Marine barracks in Beirut;
it did not stop it. And we know where
CIA support for the mujahideen in
Afghanistan like Osama bin Laden got
the United $tates.
Furthermore, the official restraints
placed on spy agencies in the late 70s
aimed to stop the abuses of powerful
government officials. Not only was the
FBI's illegal COINTELPRO killing
scores of radical Black Panthers, but even
staunchly bourgeois-liberal critics of
government policy found themselves
surveilled and harassed. The "unshackle
our intelligence agencies" types and the
Amerikans who follow them out of
"father knows best" mentality have
forgotten these recent lessons--indeed
they've forgotten the lessons their own
"founding fathers" learned regarding
government accountability.(1)
Regardless of the supposed constraints
placed on Amerikan spy agencies,
however, the Congressional report
illustrates a point we made in the last issue
of MIM Notes at length: just because the
imperialist spend $100s of billions yearly
on spying doesn't mean they know
everything. The spies may lose the crucial
piece of information in background noise,
or they may be fed false information.
An FBI official said, "This report gave
us a good overview of where a number
of failures took place, but just at the FBI
but throughout the government. But
nothing in the report says we really could
have stopped it... There are any number
of ways to second-guess this."(2)
Amerikan spy agencies have also
emphasized the incompleteness of their
knowledge in an attempt to justify their
earlier (false) claims that Iraq was trying
to buy African uranium.
Azanian freedom fighter Steven Biko
used to say "never underestimate the
inefficiency of the Security Police."(3)
MIM agrees, and urges activists not to
concede the security struggle in the face
of the imperialists obvious material
advantage. To recap our previous
conclusions:
Although the imperialists spend much
more money on intelligence than the
Imperialist `intelligence failures' -- imagined and real
proletariat does, the imperialists are not
[always] able to use what they collect
and when they do use what they collect
they come into conflict with other
imperialists with other property interests
and government agendas. For this reason,
it is always justified to struggle to make it
a little harder for the imperialists to spy
on the oppressed and exploited...
The reasons not to surrender are
numerous: 1) Raising the cost to the
enemy, because even when s/he does
espionage correctly it costs him/her. 2)
The enemy must sort out true from false
once information is obtained. 3) The
enemy may not bother.
Notes:
1. See our review of Gore Vidal's
"Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace: How
We Got to Be So Hated" at our online
bookstore or in MIM Notes 278, 15 Mar
2003.
2. Los Angeles Times, 25 Jul 2003.
3. Donald Woods, "Biko," New York:
Henry Holt, 1987, p. 86.
neither.
Benjamin Franklin is not the only
"founding father" the Amerikan
government has turned its back on. The
authors of the Federalist Papers were
suspicious of large standing armies and
warned against giving "ITAL just END
causes of war to other nations."(2) Now
the Amerikan military budget of $360
billion per year is larger than that of the
next ten (or more) largest armies
combined.(3) The United $tates spends
$10 billion per year to keep 9,000 troops
in Afghanistan, while it has promised $1
billion a year to fight AIDS in Africa--a
promise which has yet to be fulfilled.(4)
As the occupations of Afghanistan and
Iraq drag on, with 16 of the army's 33
combat brigades in Iraq alone,(5)
Amerikan generals and Secretary of
"Defense" Donald Rumsfeld are
discussing expanding the already massive
Amerikan military--reversing the
"smaller, faster" dogma Bush ran for
president on and Rumsfeld clung to as
recently as April.
The authors of the Federalist Papers
were worried that a militarily weak
United $tates would invite attack from
larger colonialist powers. Nowadays, 100s
of other countries offer easier targets than
the United $tates--yet the Bush
administration concedes it is in a
protracted "war on terror." According to
the reactionaries' own logic, then, the
attacks on the United $tates are not just
a matter of opportunism but have a basis
in just cause.
Instead of investigating the real basis
September 11: Reactionaries' failed
`security' policies exposed
for the attacks, the U.$. government
persists in its policy of "peace through
strength," even though that strategy has
not stopped the "post-war" casualty rate
for U.$. soldiers from increasing,(6) just
as it did not prevent September 11, the
Oklahoma city bombing, the embassy
bombings in Africa, first World Trade
Center bombing, the bombing of the
Marine barracks in Lebanon, etc. etc.
As we noted in our January comments
on the massive Amerikan military
budget,(3) the Amerikan "founding
fathers" warned repeatedly of the dangers
of an overbearing, permanent military.
"The violent destruction of life and
property incident to war, the continual
effort and alarm attendant on a state of
continual danger, will compel nations the
most attached to liberty to resort for
repose and security to institutions which
have a tendency to destroy their civil and
political rights. To be more safe, they at
length become willing to run the risk of
being less free. The institutions chiefly
alluded to are STANDING ARMIES and
the correspondent appendages of military
establishments."(7)
The alternative to the Amerikan