---------------------------------------------------------------------------



       AMERICANS ARE PUTTING UP WITH A SPIRALING GESTAPO STATE

                       By Paul Craig Roberts

                 Special to the Los Angeles Times



What will become of "law and order conservatism" now that we know

that our law-enforcement agencies -- from the Justice Department to

local police forces -- can be as criminal as the miscreants that they

are supposed to pursue?



Unspeakable acts of cold-blooded murder and fabricated evidence now

routinely characterize everyday acts of law enforcement in the United

States.



In Malibu, Calif., a 30-person raiding party of sheriff's deputies,

federal drug agents and the California National Guard broke into the

home of Donald Scott and shot him dead.  Scott, it turns out, was a

reclusive man, heir to a European fortune, whose $5 million, 200-acre

ranch was targeted by federal agents under drug-forfeiture laws.  No

drugs or marijuana plants were found, but an alert Ventura County

prosecutor, Michael Bradbury, did find that the raiding party had an

appraisal of Scott's ranch, along with notes on the sale price of

nearby property.  Gideon Kanner, a Los Angeles law professor who has

examined the case, concluded that the feds thought Scott might have a

wife who indulged in drugs and decided to see if they could bag a $5

million piece of property for the Treasury.



In pre-democratic times, this was known as "tax farming".  Government

officials simply seized whatever they could and raked off a

commission.  Today, the commission is in the form of the

bureaucracy's budget.  Ever since President Reagan's budget director,

David Stockman, invented "budget savings" from tougher Internal

Revenue Service and drug enforcement, the pressure has been on these

marauders to farm more revenues.  The results are mounting abuses of

citizens and occasional deaths.



What will be done about it?  Nothing.  Scott, awakened from sleep by

the sound of his door crashing in, made the mistake of walking out of

his bedroom with a gun in his hand.  The military force got off with

a self-defense plea.  Shades of Waco, Texas, where the FBI and the

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms folks killed 86 men, women

and children, while the attorney general took all the credit to show

how tough she is.



Noted defense attorney Gerry Spence told the Montana Trial Lawyers

Association in July that he had never been involved in a case with

the federal government in which the government had not lied and

manufactured evidence to gain a conviction.  "These are not the good

guys", he said.  "These are people who do what they believe is

necessary to do to bring about a conviction."  The law gets hung with

the victim.



What, you might protest, about the Los Angeles and Detroit

convictions of police officers who beat black motorists?  Aren't

these signs that checks and balances work and that we are free from

the arbitrary application of power that medieval serfs had to endure?

Alas, these police offers were not done in because they abused their

power, but because they were charged with racism and violating the

civil rights of a member of a "preferred minority".  As incredible as

it may seem, in the United States only blacks have any protection

from abusive state power.  They have a special, racial civil-rights

shield.  The rest of us must make do with happenstance.



Formally, a person could protect himself by getting rich.  But today

that just makes you more of a target.  Witness the fates of

billionaires Michael Milken and Leona Helmsley -- and of Donald

Scott.  Politically ambitious prosecutors need drama, and they don't

get that from the local drug pusher.  Federal drug agents are not

going to waste their time and risk their lives rounding up Jamaican

drug gangs (who shoot back) -- especially when inner-city juries may

not convict either out of fear or feelings of racial solidarity --

when they can pick soft targets like Scott.



Nothing makes it clearer that the United States is no longer a

"nation of laws" than federal wetlands regulations.  These "laws"

have been created entirely by bureaucrats and courts.  All over

America, people are finding their uses of their property circumvented

and themselves in jail because of these regulatory police and their

"laws".



Recently, the Clinton administartion said: "Congress should amend the

Clean Water Act to make it consistent with the agencies' rule-

making."  And Sens. Max Baucus, D-Mont., and John H. Chaff, R-R.I.,

have introduced a bill to codify all the wetlands regulations that

are being enforced without any legal basis.



Note that the two senators did not introduce a bill to stop unelected

bureaucrats from illegally creating laws and running all over our

constitutional protections.  Not even a wrist slap.  To hell with the

U.S. Constitution, say the senators.  Let's pass a law that future

courts will use to give carte blanche to the regulatory police.

Let's ennoble the bureaucrats.  Divine rule cannot be blocked by

special-interest lobbying.



Roberts, former assistant Trasury secretary, is chairman of the

Institute for Political Economy.




This and many other similar files can be found on the Patriot's Archive 
on the Internet.    The Patriot Archive is mirrored to many ftp sites on 
the Internet.  (If you are interested in having it mirrored to your site, 
please contact starrd@iia.org)

Home site for the Patriot's Archive is:     mary.iia.org
Home directory:                             /pub/users/patriot
Textfile directory of Patriot's Archive:    descript.ion
Questions, comments or submissions:         starrd@iia.org

     ***    All files available via e-mail or ftp    ***

